ArtiProof Integration Proposal

1. Host method / framework
2. Exact version / edition and official source
3. What the host method already does
4. Where consequential knowledge enters
5. Existing artefacts or evidence that can be reused
6. Smallest ArtiProof checkpoint that might add value
7. Assurance properties involved
8. Where ArtiProof would duplicate or add no value
9. Example or pilot case
10. Test that could show the integration is not useful
11. Mapping limitations and version date

No endorsement, equivalence, conformity or certification transfer is implied by submitting or publishing a Candidate mapping.