Publications

Read the ideas behind ArtiProof.

Five whitepapers explore dependable knowledge in organisations, across sectors and throughout society, with applications to ISO 30401 and DORA. Read online or download the PDFs.

4 October 2026 · New in English and Dutch

Knowledge across sectors and society

Sector · Whitepaper 1.0

Who Will Know How Tomorrow? A Sector Perspective

How does a sector develop the expertise it will need tomorrow? A proposed quick scan of learning pathways, shared dependencies and the renewal of professional judgement.

4 pages · English

Conceptual whitepaper · proposed application, not an independently validated benchmark.

Lees in het Nederlands

Society · Whitepaper 1.0

Knowledge Autonomy in Society

Who can understand, challenge and restore essential societal functions? A practical exploration of knowledge autonomy, cooperation and critical dependencies.

5 pages · English

Conceptual whitepaper · proposed application, not an independently validated benchmark.

Lees in het Nederlands

16 September 2026 · General, ISO 30401 and DORA

ArtiProof, ISO 30401 and DORA

General whitepaper · 1.2 EN

ArtiProof

Keeping Organisational Knowledge Dependable in the Age of AI

A narrative introduction to organisational knowledge and evidence-based review: confirm, qualify, challenge or find insufficient evidence.

11 pages · English · AP-WP-01

Informative · AI-assisted drafting · no independent human peer review claimed.

Interoperability whitepaper · 1.1 EN

ArtiProof and ISO 30401

From Knowledge Management to Knowledge-Fitness Review

A conceptual companion on reusing evidence and reviewing knowledge fitness in an ISO 30401 knowledge-management environment.

6 pages · English · AP-WP-02

Informative · AI-assisted drafting · no independent human peer review claimed.

Application whitepaper · 1.1 EN

ArtiProof and DORA

The Knowledge Behind Digital Operational Resilience

A proposed knowledge-fitness review for recovery, supplier exit and AI-assisted operational work, within existing resilience practice.

7 pages · English · AP-WP-03

Informative · AI-assisted drafting · no independent human peer review claimed.

The whitepapers in this section are in English. Earlier Dutch and English editions remain available below. Dutch Whitepaper 1.1 is not a translation of English 1.2, and its language-review status remains separate.

Earlier editions

Earlier publications remain available under their original versions. Use English 1.2 above for the current English introduction.

Earlier edition · Dutch

Wat moet een organisatie blijven weten?

Public Whitepaper 1.1 NL. The content and language-review status of this earlier edition are preserved.

Read the earlier Dutch edition
Earlier edition · English

Keeping Organisational Knowledge Dependable in the Age of AI

Public Whitepaper 1.1 EN, superseded by English 1.2.

Read the earlier English edition

Publication types

White Papers

Argument, context and narrative. Informative unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Method Documents

Formal definitions and assessment rules when a controlled method version is published.

Research

Hypotheses, methods, results, limitations and validation work.

Experimental

Candidate tools, mappings and guidance still being tested.

ArtiProof is ready for research, but has not yet been broadly validated by independent researchers. The first independent replication is still pending. More about the research.

Provenance, review and reuse

The sector and society whitepapers dated 4 October 2026 are version 1.0, available in English and Dutch. They explore proposed applications of ArtiProof. Their examples are hypothetical and their scans have not been independently validated. Editorial preparation was assisted by AI; no independent human peer review is claimed.

The English whitepapers dated 16 September 2026 are informative publications in the ArtiProof series, published by KopKen VZW. They disclose AI-assisted drafting and editorial preparation and claim no independent human peer review. A connection with ISO 30401 or DORA is a proposal, not institutional endorsement or a conformity assessment.

Read each item’s version, publication status, sources and limitations. Study design, internal review and independent replication are different forms of evidence. Individual contributions, funding and rights are being documented further; missing details do not establish the absence of interests or external contributions.

PDFs and earlier editions retain their own versions. This contextual note does not amend a historical publication. No general open licence is granted here; consult the material’s terms or request permission where necessary.