ArtiProof and ISO 30401
From Knowledge Management to Knowledge-Fitness Review
A conceptual companion on reusing evidence and reviewing knowledge fitness in an ISO 30401 knowledge-management environment.
6 pages · English · AP-WP-02
Proposed integrations
Build on the methods you already use.
Already using a method for quality, projects or services? These proposed integrations show what evidence you could reuse and where an additional question about knowledge might help. They are additions to a way of working, not software.
The integrations are proposals whose usefulness, effects and workload still need to be tested.
New whitepapers · English
A closer look at ISO 30401 and DORA
One paper explores the knowledge-management relationship. The other proposes an application within digital operational resilience. Both are informative proposals, not compliance assessments.
ArtiProof and DORA
The Knowledge Behind Digital Operational Resilience
A proposed knowledge-fitness review for recovery, supplier exit and AI-assisted operational work, within existing resilience practice.
7 pages · English · AP-WP-03
Boundary. These are Candidate mappings. They do not imply endorsement by the named framework owner, equivalence, certification transfer, conformity, or that applying the host method establishes ArtiProof assurance.
Candidate · external framework mapping
ArtiProof × EFQM
Use findings from organisational assessment and change to examine the knowledge that work depends on.
Open mappingCandidate · Dutch-language integration
ArtiProof × INK
Connect knowledge assurance to an open, non-prescriptive organisation-development tradition that links evaluation, improvement and professional practice.
Open mappingCandidate · delivery-method integration
ArtiProof × Scrum
Add knowledge checkpoints to existing Scrum events and artefacts without changing Scrum itself.
Open mappingCandidate · project-method integration
ArtiProof × PRINCE2
Use project boundaries, stages, practices and handover points to make consequential knowledge transfer explicit.
Open mappingCandidate · service-management integration
ArtiProof × ITIL
Use service-management practices and operational evidence to examine whether consequential service knowledge remains dependable.
Open mappingCandidate · standards-family companion
ArtiProof × ISO management systems
Treat ArtiProof as a focused knowledge-assurance companion to management systems rather than a substitute for their requirements.
Open mappingCandidate · improvement-method integration
ArtiProof × Lean / Six Sigma
Examine whether process improvement or automation puts knowledge needed for reliable operation and exception handling at risk.
Open mappingReuse the result, not a second conformity process
An integration should build on a usable authoritative result from the host framework or competent assessor. Preserve its source, version and available test or assessment identifier. If it cannot be used, record the reason before carrying out a substitute assessment. ArtiProof reviews organisational fitness for reliance; it does not recreate the external conformity decision.
Respect specialist legal, fundamental-rights and technical boundaries. Preserve and route unresolved questions, or stop or qualify the conclusion, rather than confirm a specialist matter without the required assessment. Where a governed override exists, retain it and the original system result as separate, traceable evidence states.
ArtiProof is ready for research, but has not yet been broadly validated by independent researchers. The first independent replication is still pending. More about the research.